next up previous
Next: References Up: No Title Previous: Short Range One Gluon

The Rubber Stamp Potential

As a last resort, we note that the ``success" of non-relativistic meson models (such as it is) is largely based on the fact that once a model is fit to one meson family, it is used to simply stamp out copies of the same mass splittings in every family.

Using tex2html_wrap_inline406 = 0.1 throughout the meson spectrum should give a reasonable though inexact description of all meson levels, particularly the light mesons. The NR OGE short range potential again should also be a reasonable guide to the splittings within a level. The biggest problem not covered by this model is mixing, which is a 1/ tex2html_wrap_inline623 term in the perturbative expansion. [I.e. if mixing is incorporated into a model, all other 1/ tex2html_wrap_inline623 terms must also be added, including the next order OGE terms and two-gluon-exchange factors.] Mixing within a meson family is easy to spot (e.g. the tex2html_wrap_inline534 tex2html_wrap_inline629 and tex2html_wrap_inline631 ); mixing between different isoscalar families must also be significant in this model. The tex2html_wrap_inline633 (547) can, in principle, be built up of only u tex2html_wrap_inline635 , d tex2html_wrap_inline637 , and s tex2html_wrap_inline639 quarks, but the tex2html_wrap_inline641 (958) cannot. A ground state spin 0 s tex2html_wrap_inline639 meson would have a mass below 700 MeV. Thus, the tex2html_wrap_inline641 (958) must be considered to have a significant heavy quark content. If tex2html_wrap_inline641 (958) were made of only u tex2html_wrap_inline635 , d tex2html_wrap_inline637 , and c tex2html_wrap_inline653 quarks, it would need to have about 25 percent charm quark content; if it were composed of only s tex2html_wrap_inline639 and c tex2html_wrap_inline653 quarks, its c tex2html_wrap_inline653 content would be about 10 percent. Both numbers are too high, but adding in a little b tex2html_wrap_inline661 and/or t tex2html_wrap_inline663 soon remedies the situation. [N.B. this is not a popular way of explaining the tex2html_wrap_inline641 (958) mass, although the c tex2html_wrap_inline653 branching ratios obviously favor a considerable tex2html_wrap_inline641 content for c tex2html_wrap_inline653 mesons.] Ideal mixing seems to hold outside of the ground state.

So, giving the ground state tex2html_wrap_inline633 and tex2html_wrap_inline641 mesons larger effective mass quarks than their tex2html_wrap_inline677 and tex2html_wrap_inline679 partners, using tex2html_wrap_inline406 = 0.1 throughout the spectrum, and taking tex2html_wrap_inline634 from the graph in the last section, we have the following light meson spectrum. (Bracketed masses refer to departures from almost-ideal-mixing among the isoscalars.)

Level Quark spin Meson spin / / /
1S S=0 140 135 (547) 495 643 (958)
1S S=1 770 783 894 1020
S=0 J=1 1260 1245 (1418) 1385 1490 (1700)
1P J=0 980 990 1204 1316
S=1 J=1 1254 1255 1379 1483
J=2 1320 1290 1425 1525
2S S=0 1246 1215 (1476) 1445 1550 (1746)
2S S=1 1597 1575 1668 1759
S=0 J=2 1685 1655 (1796) 1772 1860 (2020)
1D J=1 1617 1600 1728 1817
S=1 J=2 1683 1660 1770 1858
J=3 1715 1680 1792 1880
S=0 J=1 1858 1820 (1950) 1930 2010 (2150)
2P J=0 1662 1645 1804 1888
S=1 J=1 1854 1830 1926 2005
J=2 1900 1855 1958 2035
3S S=0 1843 1845 (1988) 1970 2048 (2180)
3S S=1 2094 2040 2129 2199
S=0 J=3 2004 1965 (2080) 2063 2138 (2260)
1F J=2 1972 1935 2042 2118
S=1 J=3 2003 1965 2062 2137
J=4 2022 1980 2075 2150
M0=612 M0=621 (841) M0=794 M0=926 (1212)
=-.73 =-.735 =-.729 =-.7282
Table 2:   Light Meson Spectrum


next up previous
Next: References Up: No Title Previous: Short Range One Gluon

Margaret Haire
Wed Apr 2 13:43:55 "CST 1997